Acceso a la justicia constitucional en Honduras entre 2010 y 2020 : una alternativa desde la perspectiva del antiformalismo jurídico articulado con una teoría crítica de derechos humanos

Abstract

El presente trabajo aborda la situación de la justicia constitucional en Honduras durante el siglo XXI, periodo que se ha visto marcado por una serie de avances y retrocesos, todo ello en medio de una profunda crisis democrática que continuamente debilita el Estado de Derecho y que en consecuencia amenaza la efectiva garantía de los derechos humanos. A través de una revisión crítica sobre el acceso a la justicia constitucional, se propone analizar su efectividad como herramienta de protección de los derechos humanos, especialmente a través de la figura del amparo, considerado como el recurso idóneo para la tutela judicial efectiva de estos. De esta manera se contrasta la mirada positivista que es hegemónica en el Derecho con los aportes propios de dos perspectivas (antiformalismo jurídico y teoría crítica) que aun siendo distintas demuestran tener varios puntos en común y que abogan por recuperar el potencial emancipador del Derecho.

This paper addresses the situation of constitutional justice in Honduras during the 21st century, a period marked by a series of advances and setbacks. century, a period that has been marked by a series of advances and setbacks, all in the midst of a profound democratic crisis that has continually weakened the rule of law. a profound democratic crisis that continually weakens the rule of law and consequently threatens the effective guarantee of human rights. the rule of law and that consequently threatens the effective guarantee of human rights. Through a critical review of access to constitutional justice, we propose to analyze its effectiveness as a tool for the protection of human rights. its effectiveness as a tool for the protection of human rights, especially through the figure of the amparo the figure of amparo, considered as the ideal remedy for the effective judicial protection of human rights. rights. In this way, the positivist view that is hegemonic in law is contrasted with the contributions of two perspectives (anti-positivist and anti-corruption). contributions of two perspectives (legal anti-formalism and critical theory) which, although different, show that they have different, but which have several points in common and which advocate the recovery of the emancipatory potential of law. emancipatory potential of Law.